More billable, less between-work.
For Australian agencies and consultancies where the admin between projects — proposals, onboarding, chasing, reporting — quietly eats the margin.
The shape of the problem
Proposal-to-kickoff lag
The pitch is won, then everything pauses while folders, checklists and welcome emails get made by hand.
Briefs buried in the inbox
Client requests land in individual inboxes and wait to be noticed, triaged and assigned.
Chasing approvals and invoices
The awkward follow-up email, written from scratch, every single time.
Status reporting by copy-paste
Someone assembles the same client update from the project tool every week.
What we’d show you
If a client update takes forty minutes to assemble and you send five a week, drafting them automatically from your project tool returns most of an afternoon — for someone billable. Your numbers will differ — the Assessment measures them.
How we’d start
The Assessment: about a week, one fixed fee credited toward implementation, and a clear plan — or your fee back. How it works →
We already use AI tools. What would you add?
Structure. Point tools help one person; a workflow moves the work itself. We look at where your existing subscriptions genuinely earn their place and wire the gaps into one supervised flow.
Our stack is Slack, Notion and spreadsheets. Is that enough?
Yes — modern stacks like that are the easiest to connect. The Assessment maps exactly which pieces talk to which.
Will clients notice they are talking to a robot?
No, because they are not. Automations draft and route; your people approve and send. The client experience is your voice, faster.
How fast can a first system be live?
The Assessment takes about a week and specifies the first build. The first system is typically a small number of weeks after that, depending on scope — you get the honest schedule in the roadmap.